Felsberg Advogados
  • Home
  • Who We Are
    • Who We Are
    • International Department
    • Asian Desk
    • French Desk
    • German Desk
    • Hispanic Desk
    • U.S. Desk
    • Doing Business
  • What We Do
  • Professionals
    • Equity Partners
    • Lawyers
    • Of Counsel and Business Partners
  • News
  • Doing Business
  • Contact
Instagram Linkedin Linkedin
  • Pt
  • En
Instagram Linkedin Linkedin
Felsberg Advogados
Homepage » ALERTS » Non-prosecution agreement under Law 13.964/2019 (“Anticrime Law”)
News
10/02/2020
By: André Fonseca

Non-prosecution agreement under Law 13.964/2019 (“Anticrime Law”)

ALERTS

On January 23, 2020, Law nº 13964/2019, known as the “Anticrime Law”, came into force promoting significant changes to Brazilian criminal law.

One of the most relevant innovations brought to the Criminal Procedure Code is the possibility of a “Non-Persecution Agreement” (ANPP) between the Prosecution and the person being investigated, which will prevent  the case from being submitted to the Judiciary system.

It is a decriminalizing measure that only applies to non-violent crimes with a minimum penalty up to four years, provided that the measure is, in the understanding of the Prosecutor, sufficient for retributing and preventing the crime.

According to the new law, those are the conditions required for the ANPP to be signed, cumulatively or alternatively: a) admission of guilt; b) damage compensation, except in the impossibility of doing so; c) waiver of assets and rights; d) rendering of community services; e) payment of a fine; f) any other condition indicated by Prosecution, provided it is proportional to the imputed criminal offense.

The ANPP cannot be signed if the investigated is a repeat offender, nor if he has been benefited in the last five years with another agreement or any criminal transaction, or if the fact is a domestic violence related offence. After the agreement is signed, it will be submitted to judicial homologation.

This form of the agreement was already foreseen in Resolution 181 of the National-Council for the Public Prosecution, but it still lacked a normative basis. In order to guide its members about the application of the ANPP, the Attorney General’s Office, through the statement “PGJ-CGMP – LAW 13.964/19”, established that the proposal is an institutional prerogative and not an investigated part’s subjective right, that is, the Public Prosecutor can refuse to propose the agreement, even if the objective requirements set out in the law are fulfilled.

The Attorney General’s Office also established that the non-prosecution agreement is incompatible with heinous (or equivalent) crimes, even those committed without violence. Finally, the Public Prosecutor’s Office understands that, if the agreement is terminated due to any conduct attributable to the investigated part, his confession may be used as one of the elements to file an accusation.

On the first day that Law nº 13.964/19 came into force, the Sao Paulo Public Prosecutor’s Office executed a non-criminal prosecution agreement with two people accused of tax evasion. Under the terms of the agreement, the defendants admitted they misled the tax inspection, reducing the due amount of taxes. It was also decided they would have to render community services for eight months, in addition to paying a fine.

Tags: ANPPAnticrimeLawCriminal
Share:
For area
  • Advertising, Marketing and Media
  • Agribusiness
  • Antitrust
  • Aviation
  • Capital Markets
  • Commercial Contracts
  • Compliance
  • Corporate and M&A
  • Data Centers and Digital Infrastructure
  • Dispute Resolution
  • Energy
  • Entertainment
  • Environment and Sustainability
  • Fashion
  • Financing, Banking, Fintechs and Payment methods
  • Governmental Relations
  • Immigration
  • Infrastructure
  • Intellectual Property
  • Labor and Employment
  • Life Sciences
  • Maritime
  • Oil and Gas
  • Public and Regulatory
  • Real Estate
  • Restructuring and Insolvency
  • Sports Law
  • Startups and Venture Capital
  • Tax and Wealth Management
  • Technology, Data Protection, Cybersecurity, AI and Law Enforcement
  • Telecommunications
  • Waste and Sanitation
  • White-Collar Crime and Corporate Investigations
For year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
For month
  • December 2025
  • November 2025
  • September 2025
  • July 2025
  • June 2025
  • May 2025
  • April 2025
  • March 2025
  • February 2025
  • January 2025
  • December 2024
  • November 2024
  • October 2024
  • September 2024
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
Felsberg Advogados
Logo_Eco
© FELSBERG ADVOGADOS - 2026 - All rights reserved
  • Privacy Policy
  • Anti-Corruption Policy
  • Code of Conduct
Globo
  • São Paulo
  • Rio de Janeiro
  • Brasília