Felsberg Advogados
  • Home
  • Who We Are
    • Who We Are
    • International Department
    • Asian Desk
    • French Desk
    • German Desk
    • Hispanic Desk
    • U.S. Desk
    • Doing Business
  • What We Do
  • Professionals
    • Equity Partners
    • Lawyers
    • Of Counsel and Business Partners
  • News
  • Doing Business
  • Contact
Instagram Linkedin Linkedin
  • Pt
  • En
Instagram Linkedin Linkedin
Felsberg Advogados
Homepage » ALERTS » Brazilian Superior Court of Justice recognizes mercantile nature of Stock Option Plans
News
23/09/2024
By: Gabriel Paranaguá Yuri Junqueira

Brazilian Superior Court of Justice recognizes mercantile nature of Stock Option Plans

ALERTS

Last week, the Brazilian Superior Court of Justice (STJ) rendered an important decision in Special Appeal No. 2074564/SP (Theme 1.226/STJ), which directly affects companies that offer stock option plans to directors and employees. The ruling recognized the mercantile nature of stock option plans and defined that the Individual Income Tax (IRPF) is levied if and when the purchaser of shares in the Stock Option Plan resells them and realizes a capital gain, which is subject to IRPF at rates ranging from 15% to 22.5%.

 

Central Point of the Decision

 

The decision was handed down by the 1st Section of the STJ, by a majority of votes, and established the understanding that “In the Stock Option Plan regime (art. 168, § 3, of Law no. 6,404/1976), because it is of a mercantile nature, personal income tax/IRPF is not levied when the shares are actually acquired…”. The main argument used by the STJ was that there would be no increase in assets for the benefit of the option holder/acquirer of the shares at the time the option is exercised. Thus, contrary to the National Treasury’s thesis (IRPF of 0% to 27.5% on the difference between the exercise price and the shares’ market value), the STJ ruled that taxation should only occur on the sale of the shares, if a capital gain is realized.

 

Impact on the market

 

The decision was taken under the system of repetitive appeals, and therefore has binding effects on the public administration and the Brazilian Courts. However, it is important to note that the decision deals specifically with the levy of IRPF in the case of Stock Option Plans, so the STJ’s understanding (i) does not apply to the discussion regarding the levy of Social Security Contributions (also commonly charged by the tax authorities); and (ii) does not consider other types of Share-Based Payments, such as Restricted Stock Units (RSU), Matching Shares, Phantom Share, or Performance Shares. In any case, the new guidance brings legal certainty to companies that use stock option plans as a way of retaining and incentivizing their executives and employees, promoting the alignment of interests and the development of a more competitive corporate culture.

Tags: #StackOptionPlanSTJTax
Share:
For area
  • Advertising, Marketing and Media
  • Agribusiness
  • Antitrust
  • Aviation
  • Capital Markets
  • Commercial Contracts
  • Compliance
  • Corporate and M&A
  • Data Centers and Digital Infrastructure
  • Dispute Resolution
  • Energy
  • Entertainment
  • Environment and Sustainability
  • Fashion
  • Financing, Banking, Fintechs and Payment methods
  • Governmental Relations
  • Immigration
  • Infrastructure
  • Intellectual Property
  • Labor and Employment
  • Life Sciences
  • Maritime
  • Oil and Gas
  • Public and Regulatory
  • Real Estate
  • Restructuring and Insolvency
  • Sports Law
  • Startups and Venture Capital
  • Tax and Wealth Management
  • Technology, Data Protection, Cybersecurity, AI and Law Enforcement
  • Telecommunications
  • Waste and Sanitation
  • White-Collar Crime and Corporate Investigations
For year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
For month
  • December 2025
  • November 2025
  • September 2025
  • July 2025
  • June 2025
  • May 2025
  • April 2025
  • March 2025
  • February 2025
  • January 2025
  • December 2024
  • November 2024
  • October 2024
  • September 2024
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
Felsberg Advogados
Logo_Eco
© FELSBERG ADVOGADOS - 2026 - All rights reserved
  • Privacy Policy
  • Anti-Corruption Policy
  • Code of Conduct
Globo
  • São Paulo
  • Rio de Janeiro
  • Brasília